CROP WILD RELATIVES

Print this page

Publication Detail

  [1]
This paper empirically quantifies and analyses (i) the economic contribution of wild foods to rural households, (ii) the household socio-economic, demographic, and geographical correlates of wild food income, and (iii) how wild foods can be better incorporated into integrative food security policies. We used household income data from 7975 households in 24 developing countries across three continents collected by the Poverty Environment Network (PEN). We found 77% of households to be engaged in wild food collection from forest and non-forest environments even though the share of wild food income in total household income was on average only 4%. Poorer households and households experiencing shocks derived higher income shares from wild foods. State land is the main source of forest-derived wild food income while private lands are most important for non-forest wild food income. Considerable regional variation in determinants and the direction of significant relationships indicate there is no one-size-fits-all approach to integrating wild foods into food and forest policies. However, our results reveal potential to increase household food security by integrating wild foods into national food policies in more customized ways.
Category: General
Authors: Gordon, M.H., et al.
Journal/Series: Food Policy
Publication Year: 2016

Related links


Web Address of the page:

http://www.cropwildrelatives.org/resources/publications/publication-detail/quantifying-the-economic-contribution-of-wild-food-harvests-to-rural-livelihoods-a-global-comparati/

Links in this page